close
How does this work?
A valuation is an assessment of the value of one share in a company, it is not necessarily the same as the price listed in the sharemarket. You can use a variety of methods to value a company, Valuecruncher uses Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis to help people create the valuations you see below.
| Valuation | Compared to price | Member |
Created
|
Views |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.91 |
51.59%
|
Valuecruncher | 09 Jan 2009 | 0 |
| $1.59 |
54.37%
|
isambard | 22 Nov 2008 | 25 |
| $1.24 |
24.0%
|
NZXCrunchBlog | 21 Nov 2008 | 30 |
| $0.92 |
-9.8%
|
Sam | 20 Nov 2008 | 26 |
| $1.07 |
2.88%
|
isambard | 19 Nov 2008 | 51 |
| $3.61 |
247.12%
|
jamess | 18 Nov 2008 | 32 |
| $1.02 |
-68.9%
|
tiger | 18 Nov 2008 | 110 |
| $1.31 |
4.8%
|
KiwiEMH | 16 Nov 2008 | 23 |
| $1.99 |
1.02%
|
NZXCrunchBlog | 28 Oct 2008 | 59 |
| $2.94 |
-3.29%
|
KiwiEMH | 25 Aug 2008 | 48 |
| $2.93 |
-2.98%
|
GordonGekko | 11 Aug 2008 | 49 |
| $2.65 |
0.76%
|
jeremy | 22 Jul 2008 | 65 |
| $2.91 |
10.65%
|
jeremy | 22 Jul 2008 | 57 |
| $3.03 |
8.21%
|
jeremy | 22 Jul 2008 | 53 |
| $3.02 |
7.86%
|
KiwiEMH | 21 Jul 2008 | 58 |
| $2.83 |
1.07%
|
KiwiEMH | 03 Jul 2008 | 55 |
| $3.27 |
5.48%
|
KiwiEMH | 18 Jun 2008 | 65 |
| $6.02 |
83.54%
|
Julian | 09 Jun 2008 | 74 |
| $2.99 |
-9.39%
|
KiwiEMH | 22 May 2008 | 70 |
| $2.71 |
-17.88%
|
Sam | 20 May 2008 | 67 |
| $3.22 |
1.26%
|
GordonGekko | 13 May 2008 | 73 |
| $5.38 |
66.56%
|
andrew | 13 May 2008 | 71 |
| $5.39 |
66.87%
|
LordTrask | 12 May 2008 | 80 |
Recent Comments
Company Details
| Updated: | 5 hours ago |
| Ticker: | RAK |
| Market: | NZE |









This isn't a serious valuation but a rough attempt to factor in a slow down followed by a recovery, and lower capex than VC has shown
This valuation is part of this blog post:
http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/11/stock-of-the-week-rakon-raknz-summary/
Now I've seen the H1 numbers, this just looks silly (well. I was just playing with VC for the first time), so I'll need to redo it over the weekend. Gut feel - it's much better than 1.07
I have been relatively conservative with my long-term growth and profitability assumptions. Rakon definitely has upside potential but based on the recent performance and the medium term economic outlook I have heavily discounted this scenario. This valuation is considerably below my previous valuation of Rakon (http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2007/05/updated-rakon-valuation/)and reflects the latest estimates and the performance of the company over the last 12-18 months.
Forget the last comment. I had forgotten that I'd set depreciation higher than EBITDA.